Is the Express run by a bunch of Twitters?
The Sunday Express today ran a story questioning the value of using the licence fee for BBC staff to tweet. It is a valid point to question if the BBC should be investing time in tweeting if people are not following accounts. I would agree that Twitter is still not widely used by normal people - I cannot think of a single one of my friends not involved in politics, journalism or that media that regularly uses the site. However, the article is pretty embarrassing. It repeatedly refers to Twitter feeds as sites, and instead of quoting the amount of followers the BBC accounts have, they have used the figure for how many feeds the accounts follow. So while the article claims 5 Live's Victoria Derbyshire only has two followers, she actually has 3,641 followers but only follows 2 feeds herself. A pretty feeble error. Unsurprisingly the article does not mention the number of followers Derbyshire's 5 Live colleague Richard Bacon has, 1.3m.
UPDATE 18/01/2010: The article has been removed from the Daily Express website
Media failings & judgement-lacking blogs contributed to BNP success says BBC’s Alagiah

Photo: BBC
On Friday I heard BBC newsreader George Alagiah speak about media and identity at a lecture organised by Polis at LSE. He said he was uncomfortable with a white-only party appearing on Question Time and attributed some of the blame for the electoral success of the BNP to the media. He raised concerns about blogs lacking judgement filling the vacuum left by struggling broadcasters.
Speaking about the coverage of immigration issues, Alagiah said: “When organised well-funded regional news-gathering is in retreat, opinion and hearsay fill the gap, which is all the more likely in the age of the blog. There is plenty of opinion out there, but not much of it is about judgement.”
A full article written by me about George Alagiah's speech can be found on the Journalism.co.uk blog.
